Why “CUSMA-Compliant” Didn’t Stop the New 50% Tariffs

For a year and a half, “CUSMA-compliant” was the magic phrase of this trade war. On August 22, it stopped working.

What changed

In the earlier rounds, trade-agreement compliance mattered enormously: tariffs on goods meeting USMCA/CUSMA rules were indefinitely deferred in the 2025 IEEPA-era measures, which made origin certification the difference between 0% and 25%-plus. The new Section 338 proclamations broke that pattern — by their terms, the 50% tariffs apply to covered Canadian goods even where they qualify under CUSMA, per the proclamations and law-firm analyses from Wiley and White & Case.

Why certification still matters

CUSMA certification is not dead weight. A valid claim still eliminates the underlying MFN duty that would otherwise stack beneath the surtax; it keeps you audit-ready for origin verifications that arrive years later; and if the legally contested Section 338 authority is later struck down — as the Supreme Court struck down IEEPA tariffs in February 2026 — entries with clean origin records are the straightforward ones to unwind and refund.

The practical read

Treat the 50% as a separate layer that certification cannot remove, while keeping certification discipline for everything it still controls. Our tracker follows the litigation angle; our full certification guide is live.

Sources: Presidential proclamations of July 20, 2026; Wiley and White & Case client alerts; Supreme Court of the United States, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (Feb. 20, 2026).


TariffCleared is an independent publisher. Nothing on this site is legal, customs, or financial advice. Confirm against the linked primary sources or consult a licensed professional.

Leave a Comment